Counterfoil research and development

Tools for humans.

Counterfoil studies the threshold where a tool stops serving the people who use it and starts ab/using them. We catalogue tools that keep people in charge. We also build and maintain a few of our own.

The threshold scale

Before the first watershed

The proving zone: works for some, not yet most

The convivial range

Past the second watershed

First watershed

Second watershed

Not Useful

The tool cannot yet do reliably what it claims to do.

Convivial Range

The tool does its job and still leaves its users in control.

Actively Harmful

The tool starts to defeat its alleged purpose.

How we evaluate tools • The catalogue schema • The six balances • Try the scale

How to read the map

A hollow marker is a provisional record. A solid marker is a reviewed record. (No record has had a final review yet.) Each marker sits at the lowest position its record supports. Point at a marker, or move to it with the keyboard, and a dashed line shows how far right the tool could sit if every balance not yet assessed turned out to be lost. The line shows what has not been assessed, not a measured risk. The shaded band is the convivial range, and the small mark at its centre is where a tool sits when all six balances are holding.

01

Research

Counterfoil research has two tasks: to detect the early signs of a tool turning against the people who use it, and to devise tools that preserve the balance of life. We’ll publish what we learn as we go.

Research

02

Catalogue

Every tool we catalogue gets a ticket saying what it does, where it stops, how easily you can stop using it, and where it sits relative to the two watersheds: nearing, within, or lost beyond the convivial range.

The catalogue

03

Workshop

We build tools to the same standard: open, repairable, and no bigger or more complex than their users need. The first example is this site’s own catalogue, built in the open on WordPress.

The workshop

From the catalogue

All tools

Start here

Catalogue · Mobility

The bicycle

since 1885 · Established

What it does:
Moves a person, and a modest load, three or four times faster than walking, for about a fifth of the energy walking takes over the same distance (Illich’s figures). It runs on food and needs nothing more than a passable path.
Where it stops:
At human speed and human range. It extends what a body can already do without making walking impossible or claiming the street for itself, and it doesn’t need a dedicated network to be useful. It never reaches the point Illich called a radical monopoly, where everyone is forced to use it.
How easily you can stop using it:
Repairs need common parts and simple hand tools, and community bike shops teach them. Leaving costs nothing: you can walk, and nothing in your life has been rebuilt around the bicycle.
No. 001

Open call

Know a tool that’s great, or terrible, for the people who use it?

Three surveys are open: WordPress plugins, proprietary software, and coffee makers. Each asks a few plain questions, and the most useful nominations become catalogue records.

Research

All notes

Reading, evidence, and working notes on tools, limits, and scale.

Man is the only animal whose evolution has been conditioned by adaptation on more than one front. If he did not succumb to predators and forces of nature, he had to cope with use and abuse by others of his own kind. In his struggle with the elements and with his neighbor, his character and culture were formed, his instincts withered, and his territory was turned into a home.

Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis (1976)
Line drawing of a paperback cover: ILLICH, Tools for Conviviality, with the words “Read this strange book closely,” New York Times, and a cyclist in a red sweater riding out of the frame.
Ivan Illich, Tools for Conviviality (1973), redrawn after the 1975 Fontana paperback. Illich wrote it at CIDOC, the centre he ran in Cuernavaca, Mexico, two years after Deschooling Society. It asks what limits tools need if people are to stay in charge of them. Among its readers was Lee Felsenstein, a designer of early personal computers. Still in print and widely read in the appropriate technology and degrowth movements.

The question we ask of every tool

Does it make people more capable, or more dependent?

Ivan Illich demonstrated how modern tools and institutions pass through two watersheds. After crossing the first, they become useful and start doing real good. After the second, they start to undermine the purpose they were built for. Medicine, he argued, crossed the first watershed around 1913 and the second by the mid-1950s.

New to Illich? Start with What is “counterfoil research”? then Why more makes less and Judge a tool by what it does. The reading list has his books and the writing about them.